A complete comparison with the competitors
Why should you invest with us in the stock market?
Most famous hedge funds still rely on the old-fashioned methods of analyzing the stocks with generally inefficient human-based solutions. Hence, most of them underperformed the benchmark S&P 500 in recent years. The difference between conventional methods and the Analytical platform is simple; using state-of-the-art technologies to analyze stocks –instead of other inefficient methods.
Using AI and Machine Learning
in the World of Investing
Comparison of Performance with the Best Hedge Funds
The competitor products presented here consist of the most preferred hedge funds’ products in the world of investing and also an S&P 500 ETF for the benchmark. We used the following strategies, which you can find easily on the internet. They have really similar portfolios also consisting of large-cap stocks (mainly from the US exchanges):
Vanguard, Vanguard Windsor Fund Investor (VWNDX),
Charles Schwab, Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX),
UBS, UBS Global Allocation Fund (BNGLX),
SPDR, SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
Compared to our competitors, our strategies have much better results and even lower drawdowns. As can be seen clearly below, our strategies have beaten most of the popular hedge funds, including the benchmark itself. Thus, being one of the safest and best investments in the world of investment, with a really low drawdown.
Note: These comparisons are based on the official presented results of the competitors. By using MSN Finance. Period between Jan 2008 – Dec 2021. The AP’s results are back-tested until 2020, and after that we have proven track record in real operations
Comparison of yearly performance
As could be seen in the chart, both our strategies performed way better than the competitors’ products and the median of them, even without including the fees.
Comparison of drawdowns
In the same case concerning the drawdowns, our hedge strategy outperformed all of the competitors’ products. However, our aggressive strategy had a worse drawdown compared to Schwab’s fund but still performed better than the market and the median of the products.